Abstract:
In the context of ensuring an effective strategy for sustainable
development, it is necessary to consider that modern education is mainly
focused on the theoretical type of scientific knowledge, on natural and
engineering-technological models of thinking. At the same time, the
theory of pedagogy is constantly debated and criticized by scientism. It
is a term that doesn’t exist in the European countries - humanitarian or
humanistic technologies - it is like wooden iron, because both the
humanitarian and humanistic paradigms were formulated and spread as
an alternative to the technological direction, starting from it. This is a
contradiction within the theory. Another contradiction: despite the
frontal critique of the school of knowledge and subject-centrism, in
practice such a subject-oriented or psychologically-oriented approach
remains dominant. It is important to understand the reasons for
this, otherwise we will not be able to find a practical way out of this
situation, one criticism is not enough. This is not an internal pedagogical
issue, but the convenience of management, external control over the
activities of the education system, educational institution. Attempts to
reform the pedagogical system constantly run into this circumstance, as
pedagogy in its main part remains entirely state and regulated from the
outside, no matter how much we talk about the partial autonomy of
school education, higher education.
Description:
Tymoshenko Yu., Palamarchuk O.,Iehupov M.,Dovbenko T. Susta in able development in the model of anintegrated system of public education, creativity and humanistic learning / Yu. Tymoshenko., O. Palamarchuk, M. Iehupov and others // E3S Web of Conferences Sustainable Economy and Communities (24 June 2021). - 2021. - № 277. - Р.1-9.