Sustainable development in the model of an integrated system of public education, creativity and humanistic learning

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Tymoshenko Yurii
dc.contributor.author Palamarchuk Olha
dc.contributor.author Iehupov Mykola
dc.contributor.author Dovbenko Tetyana
dc.date.accessioned 2021-06-30T09:16:30Z
dc.date.available 2021-06-30T09:16:30Z
dc.date.issued 2021-06-24
dc.identifier.udk http://reposit.uni-sport.edu.ua/handle/787878787/3109
dc.description Sustainable development in the model of an integrated system of public education, creativity and humanistic learning /Yurii Tymoshenko, Olha Palamarchuk, Mykola Iehupov, Tetyana Dovbenko // Sustainable Economy and Communities Sustainable Economy and Communities 2021, 24 June 2021 [Internet] Доступно:https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127706010 uk_UA
dc.description.abstract In the context of ensuring an effective strategy for sustainable development, it is necessary to consider that modern education is mainly focused on the theoretical type of scientific knowledge, on natural and engineering-technological models of thinking. At the same time, the theory of pedagogy is constantly debated and criticized by scientism. It is a term that doesn’t exist in the European countries - humanitarian or humanistic technologies - it is like wooden iron, because both the humanitarian and humanistic paradigms were formulated and spread as an alternative to the technological direction, starting from it. This is a contradiction within the theory. Another contradiction: despite the frontal critique of the school of knowledge and subject-centrism, in practice such a subject-oriented or psychologically-oriented approach remains dominant. As a result, in the minds of schoolchildren, students there is a mosaic of unrelated pieces of knowledge. Why do we hold such an approach so firmly? It is important to understand the reasons for this, otherwise we will not be able to find a practical way out of this situation, one criticism is not enough. This is not an internal pedagogical issue, but the convenience of management, external control over the activities of the education system, educational institution. Attempts to reform the pedagogical system constantly run into this circumstance, as pedagogy in its main part remains entirely state and regulated from the outside, no matter how much we talk about the partial autonomy of school, education, higher education. The model of Waldorf pedagogy is still the only one that aims to transfer the experience of sustainable development in various fields comprehensively, that is, in its own way repeats the development of mankind in teaching. In Waldorf pedagogy, the component of responsibility is realized, for instance, through environmental education. It is necessary to perceive the activity as a part of the general activity. Freedom has a structure and necessarily includes a component of responsibility uk_UA
dc.language.iso en uk_UA
dc.publisher Sustainable Economy and Communities Sustainable Economy and Communities 2021 uk_UA
dc.relation.ispartofseries Том 277, 2021;
dc.subject Waldorf pedagogy uk_UA
dc.subject sustainable development uk_UA
dc.subject pedagogical system Waldorf pedagogy uk_UA
dc.title Sustainable development in the model of an integrated system of public education, creativity and humanistic learning uk_UA
dc.title.alternative Сталий розвиток у моделі інтегрованої системи державної освіти, творчості та гуманістичного навчання uk_UA
dc.type Article uk_UA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account